![]() |
| ©Disney |
So it was with great trepidation that I went to see the new live action Beauty and the Beast film. It was more something I felt that I should see than something I wanted to see. From the previews it looked like it was essentially a shot-for-shot remake, and as a fan of classic animation, especially when it suits the story and is the right fit, I failed to see why a remake was necessary or desirable. But I went in with an open mind, hoping to fall in love with my favorite characters brought to life.
....But what I saw, far from them being brought to life, were characters deadened and flattened into far less dimension than the ones created by ink and paint in 1991. Most perplexing to me was the opening musical sequence of Belle wandering around her village singing "Little Town." In the original film, the song is used to show that Belle is so full of excitement for life that she bubbles over and her tiny, quaint village can neither contain nor understand that excitement. She turns to books to travel outside the confines of her little town -- but despite her interest in discussing her books with people, there's no one who's interested in hearing what she has to say, cutting her off as she tries to express her excitement so they can go about their daily tasks.... So she escapes into her books in a solitary existence, with only the sheep to expound the merits of her favorite book to. And she is of course judged for this by the villagers, who don't understand her desire for something more and the reason she turns to books.... They just mock her, and she ignores their gossip and rude comments because this woman's got a purpose and books to read and things to do and no way are ignorant people with a lack of curiosity in their world going to get in her way. It's the ultimate nerd-power sequence.
In the live action film, I was shocked to see this sequence turned into one in which a pouty Belle strolls aimlessly around town rolling her eyes at villagers (some of whom curiously seem to stand in place not doing anything until they become aware the roving camera is on them and then they sing their line and promptly stop acting again like they weren't given any direction beyond to wait for the camera... but that's a whole other issue). Gone is her warmth towards others. Gone is her love of life and excitement. Gone is any attempt to engage other villagers in her passions. In fact, gone is her passion. Does she still get a book? Sure. From a library that doesn't actually have any books in it (were the set dressers not on set that day?), so I guess that explains why Belle doesn't really have much of a thing for books in this version.... In fact, she doesn't actually READ the book she borrows, wandering around with it closed most of the time and singing in the camera's general direction to no one in particular about a specific passage she's apparently reading through osmosis. ("It's my favorite part because... you'll see." Who, Belle? Who will see? And how will they see it if the book's closed?)
While most of the dialogue in the film is the same as in the animated version, the conversation with the bookseller about the book she's borrowing being her favorite because it's full of "far off places, daring sword fights, magic spells, a prince in disguise" (dialogue she delivers with the unbridled enthusiasm that is the hallmark of a true nerd-in-the-best-way) is cut and replaced by some cool ennui-ridden dialogue about not wanting to return from the Italy of Romeo and Juliet and his library making their small town seem big. (Again -- WHAT LIBRARY?? WHERE ARE ALL THE BOOKS?? And I must admit this is where the film lost me. Nerds get made fun of for being overly enthusiastic and excited. That's the whole basis of the teasing. Nerds don't get made fun of for ennui. And Belle's infectious excitement is not only endearing but is at the heart of her character.) Also cut is Belle jumping at the chance to talk to the Baker about her book and its beanstalk and ogre before he brushes her off. Here, instead, she tosses to a villager the info that "it's about two lovers in fair Verona" while literally walking away from him, clearly uninterested in trying to bring him into her excitement. (He responds "Sounds boring." I have to admit her description and attitude wouldn't get me interested either. Did she even like it? I can't quite tell by the way she gives him the least-exciting description of Romeo And Juliet humanly possible.) So... explain to me why Belle's an outcast? Is it just because she's an annoying teenager who's kind of bored by and disinterested in everything? Yeah, I wouldn't want to spend much time around her either. (Oh and that book she was returning to the bookseller in this version? Yeah, it wasn't actually a book. Romeo and Juliet's a play. I love Shakespeare too, but we've replaced an adventure book with a romance that wasn't even intended by its author to be read. Later she reads poetry to the Beast. So... does Belle actually read books at all?)
Though this early dialogue about Belle's reading is cut, however, added later is some talk with the Beast about her favorite play -- Romeo and Juliet again, of course... and she and the Beast have an exchange about it being a romance. And when he reads King Arthur, though he insists it's because of the action, Belle again highlights that it's a romance. What happened to the girl who loved daring sword fights and ogres? Now she only likes romances? Perhaps that's why this Belle shows no interest in using the added magic tool of a seemingly wordless book that can literally physically transport you anywhere your imagination can think of when you simply place your hand on it. (So... just to be clear, this "magic book" isn't really a book at all. It's just a magic sheet of dead tree enclosed by dead animal skin. Pretty sure that does not a book make. It's a virtual reality video game. And I'm not sure how I feel about what this addition seems to be saying about the lack of regular books' ability to transport through imagination, since Belle's interest in escaping into the adventure of books has already been mostly stripped from the film and replaced by the notion that the only kind of escape to be gained from books is a romantic, geographical one. In an age where people use iPads and iPhones more than they read books, are we ignoring the ability of books to open up worlds to the reader through no magic trick other than their own imagination? Isn't that the whole purpose of books in the first place? I get the strong feeling that those responsible for the script's updating are not book readers.) Though Belle understandably uses the magic book to take her to her first home to learn the story of her mother's death, she then immediately tells the Beast, "Let's go home" and never expresses an interest in any of that "adventure in the great wide somewhere" that she had so dreamily-if-lackadaisically sung about earlier. Where is Belle's sense of adventure when she actually has the opportunity to indulge it?
I get the impression that this Belle will become a homebody and live forever in her remote castle with her Prince Charming, reading romantic poetry and plays and perhaps the occasional angsty young adult romance novel. And that's fine. But that's not the adventure-loving nerdy Belle from the original film that I so admired as a child and thought was a great role model. What message does someone come away from this Beauty and the Beast with? Keep an open mind and you won't be turned into a Beast? If you're nice to talking animals you'll get a castle and a prince?
I'd rather be transported by a good book. One with adventure in the great wide somewhere.




