The first words I heard were a woman exclaiming to her friend that she didn't remember the show being so gripping (I would say "gripping" is an understatement for the last act of this production), and in addition to the dozen or so people I heard ask their friends what disease Oswald had ("worms in his brain? I don't get it. Why did he point down there?"), everyone seemed to be buzzing about it and asking their friends questions about what they'd seen. (Hopefully, for some of them their curiosity will lead them to the program notes detailing the fascinating reception Ibsen's play received at the time of its writing due to its taboo subject matters, including Oswald's syphilis.) As I walked to the subway afterwards, all I heard were conversations about the show.... And my subway walk turned particularly long and meandering since I hadn't been to BAM in years, couldn't remember which direction I'd come from, had a dead cellphone, and mistakenly thought if I just followed the large groups of people, I'd find my subway stop. I didn't find my subway line that way (though I found some other subway lines... and buses, and taxis, and a Caribbean restaurant), but I did get to hear lots of discussions and debates about the play -- not the usual "yeah, that actress was good" comments, but discussions about the themes of free love, guilt, duty, marriage, disease, euthanasia.... People had already moved beyond just the story on the stage and were using it as a launch-board to discuss its topics as they relate to the world today.
Indeed. The director comments in the program notes that during a period when the show was banned in England, a single unlicensed performance of it "detonated an explosion of critical venom." Though today's audiences receive the play without the venom and shock it once met, the play clearly can still detonate an explosion of conversation. And that, to me, is a mark of a truly successful show.
No comments:
Post a Comment